- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 21:28:10 -0700
- To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: "'Dare Obasanjo'" <dareo@microsoft.com>, "'Dan Connolly'" <connolly@w3.org>, <www-tag@w3.org>
On Thursday, October 23, 2003, at 11:34 AM, David Orchard wrote: > I'd like to offer the way I'd like this to play out: > 1. The TAG produces a finding on extensibility/versioning that is > schema > neutral > 2. The TAG produces a finding or a Note on how to achieve said > extensibility > in xml schema. XML Schema is after all the annointed schema language > for > XML by the W3C. And customers/specs are using it right now. > 3. Some group of people (myself/TAG as a body/interested parties) > comment on > what XML Schema could do in v1.1 to make extensibility and versioning > easier. I'm OK with this approach. -Tim
Received on Friday, 24 October 2003 00:28:13 UTC