- From: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 11:02:53 -0800
- To: "Dean Hiller" <dhiller@avaya.com>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
comments inline ________________________________ From: Dean Hiller [mailto:dhiller@avaya.com] Sent: Sat 11/22/2003 10:12 AM To: Dare Obasanjo Cc: www-tag@w3.org Subject: Re: versioning use case This is exactly what I mean though. A company has extended the schema using "extension", yet I don't want their additional features. I just want to validate the base schema is ok. I can't. It is all or nothing. I have to validate base schema plus the companies additional elements(their extension), or I can't validate it at all. [Dare Obasanjo] If the base complex type has a wildcard with processContents="lax" then you can get what you want. The only thing is I think it is much cleaner to do extension. It is like OO. [Dare Obasanjo] W3C XML Schema isn't like OO, it seems like it is but it isn't. I've gone into this in more detail at http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/10/29/derivation.html
Received on Saturday, 22 November 2003 14:03:12 UTC