- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 01:38:33 +0200
- To: <www-tag@w3.org>
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of > Martin Duerst > Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 11:24 PM > To: Roy T. Fielding; Julian Reschke > Cc: www-tag@w3.org > Subject: Re: Draft TAG finding available: Client handling of MIME > headers > > ... > > >>If a client PUTs a UTF-8 encoded XML document and properly declares both > >>type and encoding, but a subsequent GET returns different (and wrong!) > >>information this really smells like a bug, not a feature. > > > >What the server should do is reject the PUT if the metadata is > >inconsistent with its configuration. > > Why shouldn't the server just update the configuration? > Is there anything in the HTTP spec that says that server > configuration is more important than the metadata attached > to a document? Thanks, Martin :-) Aren't we just reviewing a draft TAG finding that says that MIME headers are authorative? So I really don't see how Apache/moddav's current behaviour can be considered correct -- it's not like the server administrator currently can make a conscious decision to respect MIME headers sent by the client. The default handling is to ignore them, and there's no way to change that (unless I oversee a config option -- if I do I'd really love to learn about that one). Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2003 19:38:44 UTC