- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: 27 Mar 2003 17:28:22 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Hello,
The agenda [1] of the TAG's 31 Mar 2003 teleconf
is available as HTML [1] and as text below.
- Ian
[1] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/31-tag.html
========================================================
Agenda for 31 Mar 2003 TAG teleconference
Nearby: [4]Teleconference details · [5]issues list · [6]www-tag
archive
[4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#remote
[5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist
[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/
Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of
business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.
1. Administrative (30min)
1. Confirm Chair, Scribe.
2. Accept [7]24 Feb telecon minutes?
3. Accept this [8]agenda?
4. Next meeting: 7 April?
[7] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/24-tag-summary.html
[8] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/31-tag.html
1.1 Meeting planning
* The TAG will strive to organize a virtual meeting shortly after
the WWW Conference. See [9]thoughts from SW on organizing a
virtual meeting.
Action TBL 2003/03/17: Propose June dates (after 4 June).
* Completed Action IJ: Add Japan ftf meeting to calendar
* Upcoming discussions:
+ The TAG expects to discuss its [10]W3C track presentation on
7 April
+ The TAG expects to discuss its presentation to the AC on 14
and 21 April.
[9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0082.html
[10] http://www2003.org/t_www.htm
1.2 Mailing list management
* Completed action IJ: Announce creation of public-tag-announce to
chairs and tech plenary participants (and to AC).
2. Technical (60min)
2.1 Architecture document
See also: [11]findings.
1. [12]26 Mar 2003 Working Draft of Arch Doc:
1. Action DC 2003/02/06: Attempt a redrafting of 1st para under
[13]2.2.4 of 6 Feb 2003 draft
2. Action DC 2003/01/27: write two pages on correct and
incorrect application of REST to an actual web page design
3. Action DO 2003/01/27: Please send writings regarding Web
services to tag@w3.org. DO grants DC license to cut and paste
and put into DC writing.
4. Action CL 2003/0127: Draft language for arch doc that takes
language from internet media type registration, propose for
arch doc, include sentiment of TB's second sentence from
CP10.
5. Action TB 2003/01/27: Develop CP11 more: Avoid designing new
protocols if you can accomplish what you want with HTTP. DC
suggested describing GET/PUT/POST in a para each, then say
"if your app looks like that, use HTTP". [14]Proposal from TB
to withdraw the proposal.
6. Action DC 2003/03/17: : Write some text for interactions
chapter of arch doc related to [15]message passing, a dual of
shared state.
[11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
[12] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-webarch-20030326/
[13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/webarch-20030206#uri-use
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0005
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Mar/0018.html
2.2 Issues the TAG intends to discuss
* [16]URIEquivalence-15
+ Action SW, PC 2003/03/24: Review [17]IETF draft on URIs to
see whether text satisfies URIEquivalence-15.
* [18]IRIEverywhere-27
+ Action CL/IJ 2003/03/17: Send edited piece that CL/MD/IJ
wrote to www-tag. CL expects this by 31 Mar.
* [19]namespaceDocument-8
+ Next steps on [20]RDDL Proposal from Tim Bray/Paul Cotton
* [21]xmlIDSemantics-32
+ Status of Chris Lilley draft finding in this area? See
[22]early snapshot from CL
* [23]abstractComponentRefs-37
+ Action TB 2003/03/24: Summarize TB's opinion on this
discussion and relation to other issues.
* Updates or reports on other issues?
[16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#URIEquivalence-15
[17] http://www.apache.org/~fielding/uri/rev-2002/rfc2396bis.html
[18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#IRIEverywhere-27
[19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#namespaceDocument-8
[20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0213
[21] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlIDSemantics-32
[22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0102.html
[23] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/24-tag-summary.html#abstractComponentRefs-37
2.3 Issues that have associated action items
* [24]contentTypeOverride-24
+ See [25]email from DC to Voice Browser WG.
+ Action IJ 2003/03/24: Draft up some language; make connection
to error-handling issue. TAG position with rationale why to
not override server value of content type.
* [26]xlinkScope-23
+ Status report?
+ See [27]draft, and [28]SW message to CG chairs.
* [29]siteData-36
+ Action TBL 2003/02/24 : Summarize siteData-36
* [30]xmlFunctions-34
+ Action TBL 2003/02/06: State the issue with a reference to
XML Core work. See [31]email from TimBL capturing some of the
issues.
* [32]binaryXML-30
+ Action TB 2003/02/17: Write to www-tag with his thoughts on
adding to survey.
+ Next steps to finding? See [33]summary from Chris.
* [34]contentPresentation-26
+ Action CL 2003/02/06: Create a draft finding in this space.
Deadline 3 March.
* [35]rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
+ Action DC 2003/02/06: Propose TAG response to XML Schema
desideratum ([36]RQ-23).
* [37]uriMediaType-9
+ Action DC 2003/02/06: Start discussion on
discuss@apps.ietf.org, but not urgent
* [38]HTTPSubstrate-16
+ Action RF 2003/02/06: Write a response to IESG asking whether
the Web services example in the SOAP 1.2 primer is intended
to be excluded from RFC 3205
+ See [39]message from Larry Masinter w.r.t. Web services.
* [40]errorHandling-20
+ Action CL 2003/02/06: Write a draft finding on the topic of
(1) early/late detection of errors (2) late/early binding (3)
robustness (4) definition of errors (5) recovery once error
has been signaled. Deadline first week of March.
* [41]metadataInURI-31
+ Action SW 2003/02/06: Draft finding for this one.
* [42]fragmentInXML-28 : Use of fragment identifiers in XML.
1. Connection to content negotiation?
2. Connection to opacity of URIs?
3. No actions associated / no owner.
[24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentTypeOverride-24
[25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0085.html
[26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#xlinkScope-23
[27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0094.html
[28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0104
[29] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#siteData-36
[30] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlFunctions-34
[31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0309.html
[32] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#binaryXML-30
[33] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0224.html
[34] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentPresentation-26
[35] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
[36] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xmlschema-11-req-20030121/#N400183
[37] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#uriMediaType-9
[38] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#HTTPSubstrate-16
[39] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0208.html
[40] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#errorHandling-20
[41] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#metadataInURI-31
[42] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#fragmentInXML-28
3. Other actions
* Action IJ 2003/02/06: Modify issues list to show that
actions/pending are orthogonal to decisions. IJ is working with
PLH on this. Revisit this end of April.
_________________________________________________________________
Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL
Last modified: $Date: 2003/03/27 16:56:39 $
--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2003 17:28:25 UTC