[Agenda] 31 Mar 2003 TAG teleconf (arch doc, URIEquivalence-15, IRIEverywhere-27, namespaceDocument-8, xmlIdSemantics-32, abstractComponentRefs-37)


The agenda [1] of the TAG's 31 Mar 2003 teleconf
is available as HTML [1] and as text below.

 - Ian

[1] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/31-tag.html


           Agenda for 31 Mar 2003 TAG teleconference

   Nearby: [4]Teleconference details  [5]issues list  [6]www-tag

      [4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#remote
      [5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist
      [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/

   Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of
   business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.

1. Administrative (30min)

    1. Confirm Chair, Scribe.
    2. Accept [7]24 Feb telecon minutes?
    3. Accept this [8]agenda?
    4. Next meeting: 7 April?

      [7] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/24-tag-summary.html
      [8] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/31-tag.html

  1.1 Meeting planning

     * The TAG will strive to organize a virtual meeting shortly after
       the WWW Conference. See [9]thoughts from SW on organizing a
       virtual meeting.
       Action TBL 2003/03/17: Propose June dates (after 4 June).
     * Completed Action IJ: Add Japan ftf meeting to calendar
     * Upcoming discussions:
          + The TAG expects to discuss its [10]W3C track presentation on
            7 April
          + The TAG expects to discuss its presentation to the AC on 14
            and 21 April.

      [9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0082.html
     [10] http://www2003.org/t_www.htm

1.2 Mailing list management

     * Completed action IJ: Announce creation of public-tag-announce to
       chairs and tech plenary participants (and to AC).

2. Technical (60min)

  2.1 Architecture document

   See also: [11]findings.
    1. [12]26 Mar 2003 Working Draft of Arch Doc:
         1. Action DC 2003/02/06: Attempt a redrafting of 1st para under
            [13]2.2.4 of 6 Feb 2003 draft
         2. Action DC 2003/01/27: write two pages on correct and
            incorrect application of REST to an actual web page design
         3. Action DO 2003/01/27: Please send writings regarding Web
            services to tag@w3.org. DO grants DC license to cut and paste
            and put into DC writing.
         4. Action CL 2003/0127: Draft language for arch doc that takes
            language from internet media type registration, propose for
            arch doc, include sentiment of TB's second sentence from
         5. Action TB 2003/01/27: Develop CP11 more: Avoid designing new
            protocols if you can accomplish what you want with HTTP. DC
            suggested describing GET/PUT/POST in a para each, then say
            "if your app looks like that, use HTTP". [14]Proposal from TB
            to withdraw the proposal.
         6. Action DC 2003/03/17: : Write some text for interactions
            chapter of arch doc related to [15]message passing, a dual of
            shared state.

     [11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
     [12] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-webarch-20030326/
     [13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/webarch-20030206#uri-use
     [14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0005
     [15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Mar/0018.html

  2.2 Issues the TAG intends to discuss

     * [16]URIEquivalence-15
          + Action SW, PC 2003/03/24: Review [17]IETF draft on URIs to
            see whether text satisfies URIEquivalence-15.
     * [18]IRIEverywhere-27
          + Action CL/IJ 2003/03/17: Send edited piece that CL/MD/IJ
            wrote to www-tag. CL expects this by 31 Mar.
     * [19]namespaceDocument-8
          + Next steps on [20]RDDL Proposal from Tim Bray/Paul Cotton
     * [21]xmlIDSemantics-32
          + Status of Chris Lilley draft finding in this area? See
            [22]early snapshot from CL
     * [23]abstractComponentRefs-37
          + Action TB 2003/03/24: Summarize TB's opinion on this
            discussion and relation to other issues.
     * Updates or reports on other issues?

     [16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#URIEquivalence-15
     [17] http://www.apache.org/~fielding/uri/rev-2002/rfc2396bis.html
     [18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#IRIEverywhere-27
     [19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#namespaceDocument-8
     [20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0213
     [21] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlIDSemantics-32
     [22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0102.html
     [23] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/24-tag-summary.html#abstractComponentRefs-37

  2.3 Issues that have associated action items

     * [24]contentTypeOverride-24
          + See [25]email from DC to Voice Browser WG.
          + Action IJ 2003/03/24: Draft up some language; make connection
            to error-handling issue. TAG position with rationale why to
            not override server value of content type.
     * [26]xlinkScope-23
          + Status report?
          + See [27]draft, and [28]SW message to CG chairs.
     * [29]siteData-36
          + Action TBL 2003/02/24 : Summarize siteData-36
     * [30]xmlFunctions-34
          + Action TBL 2003/02/06: State the issue with a reference to
            XML Core work. See [31]email from TimBL capturing some of the
     * [32]binaryXML-30
          + Action TB 2003/02/17: Write to www-tag with his thoughts on
            adding to survey.
          + Next steps to finding? See [33]summary from Chris.
     * [34]contentPresentation-26
          + Action CL 2003/02/06: Create a draft finding in this space.
            Deadline 3 March.
     * [35]rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
          + Action DC 2003/02/06: Propose TAG response to XML Schema
            desideratum ([36]RQ-23).
     * [37]uriMediaType-9
          + Action DC 2003/02/06: Start discussion on
            discuss@apps.ietf.org, but not urgent
     * [38]HTTPSubstrate-16
          + Action RF 2003/02/06: Write a response to IESG asking whether
            the Web services example in the SOAP 1.2 primer is intended
            to be excluded from RFC 3205
          + See [39]message from Larry Masinter w.r.t. Web services.
     * [40]errorHandling-20
          + Action CL 2003/02/06: Write a draft finding on the topic of
            (1) early/late detection of errors (2) late/early binding (3)
            robustness (4) definition of errors (5) recovery once error
            has been signaled. Deadline first week of March.
     * [41]metadataInURI-31
          + Action SW 2003/02/06: Draft finding for this one.
     * [42]fragmentInXML-28 : Use of fragment identifiers in XML.
         1. Connection to content negotiation?
         2. Connection to opacity of URIs?
         3. No actions associated / no owner.

     [24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentTypeOverride-24
     [25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0085.html
     [26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#xlinkScope-23
     [27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0094.html
     [28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0104
     [29] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#siteData-36
     [30] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlFunctions-34
     [31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0309.html
     [32] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#binaryXML-30
     [33] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0224.html
     [34] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentPresentation-26
     [35] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
     [36] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xmlschema-11-req-20030121/#N400183
     [37] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#uriMediaType-9
     [38] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#HTTPSubstrate-16
     [39] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0208.html
     [40] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#errorHandling-20
     [41] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#metadataInURI-31
     [42] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#fragmentInXML-28

3. Other actions

     * Action IJ 2003/02/06: Modify issues list to show that
       actions/pending are orthogonal to decisions. IJ is working with
       PLH on this. Revisit this end of April.


    Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL
    Last modified: $Date: 2003/03/27 16:56:39 $

Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447

Received on Thursday, 27 March 2003 17:28:25 UTC