W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2003

Re: IRIs [was: [Minutes] 17 Mar 2003 TAG teleconf...]

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 18 Mar 2003 13:42:16 +0000
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>, www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bhea03i6f.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> writes:

> On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 04:10, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> > [...]
> >  I urge the TAG to quickly agree a
> > form of words suitable for these three specs to include, and the
> > Director to allow them to go forward using those words.
> What's the urgency? Either the TAG provides input in time
> to be useful for these specs, or it doesn't, right?
> i.e. the TAG isn't critical path for these specs somehow,
> is it?

I read the log of the XInclude call as saying that yes, this _is_
urgent, that XInclude (and _a fortiori_ XML 1.1 and XML Namespaces
1.1) aren't going forward, even to PR, until this is sorted.  Perhaps
I misread the log.

  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                      Half-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2003 08:42:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:58 UTC