W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2003

Re: IRIs [was: [Minutes] 17 Mar 2003 TAG teleconf...]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 18 Mar 2003 07:23:37 -0600
To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>, www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <1047993817.32034.1605.camel@dirk.dm93.org>

On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 04:10, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> [...]

>  I urge the TAG to quickly agree a
> form of words suitable for these three specs to include, and the
> Director to allow them to go forward using those words.

What's the urgency? Either the TAG provides input in time
to be useful for these specs, or it doesn't, right?
i.e. the TAG isn't critical path for these specs somehow,
is it?

> If we get it wrong, it won't be a catastrophe, and we'll fix it later
> that's what we agreed back in San Jose, and I still believe it's the
> right strategy.
> ht
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2003 08:22:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:58 UTC