- From: Chris Croome <chris@webarchitects.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 16:57:11 +0000
- To: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Cc: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org
Hi On Wed 05-Mar-2003 at 08:39:11AM -0500, Jonathan Borden wrote: > > On the other hand I see no need to apply the property "dc:date" > whenever we intend to use a date -- a point of RDF datatyping is > that a property's _datatype_ is a function of the property, so > that we might have: > > site:creation-date > site:last-modification-date > site:backup-date There are also these DC dates: dcterms:created http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#created dcterms:modified http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#modified and quite a few others, there is not one that matches backup though, the full list of DC elements are in this new document: DCMI Metadata Terms http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/ Chris -- Chris Croome <chris@webarchitects.co.uk> web design http://www.webarchitects.co.uk/ web content management http://mkdoc.com/ everything else http://chris.croome.net/
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2003 11:57:14 UTC