- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 25 Jun 2003 20:05:30 -0500
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Cc: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 18:35, Tim Bray wrote: > Dan Connolly wrote: > > > > > Let's do change "equivalence" to "coreference". > > I'm not comfortable with that at all. In particular, rfc2396bis now > talks entirely in terms of equivalence, and in section 6.1 I think makes > the context pretty clear. So it's over to Dan: if "equivalence" is a > show-stopper for you, then publication is on hold until we can hash this > out as a group. No, it's not a showstopper, just my preference. I can see that not everybody prefers it. I'll have to firm up my argument if I want to push it further. > > rfc3296bis: http://www.apache.org/~fielding/uri/rev-2002/rfc2396bis.html -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2003 21:04:56 UTC