Re: Arch Doc: 23 June 2003 Editor's Draft (equivalence -> coreference)

On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 18:35, Tim Bray wrote:
> Dan Connolly wrote:
> > 
> > Let's do change "equivalence" to "coreference".
> I'm not comfortable with that at all.  In particular, rfc2396bis now 
> talks entirely in terms of equivalence, and in section 6.1 I think makes 
> the context pretty clear.  So it's over to Dan: if "equivalence" is a 
> show-stopper for you, then publication is on hold until we can hash this 
> out as a group.

No, it's not a showstopper, just my preference.

I can see that not everybody prefers it. I'll have
to firm up my argument if I want to push it further.

> rfc3296bis:

Dan Connolly, W3C

Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2003 21:04:56 UTC