Dan Connolly wrote: > > Let's do change "equivalence" to "coreference". I'm not comfortable with that at all. In particular, rfc2396bis now talks entirely in terms of equivalence, and in section 6.1 I think makes the context pretty clear. So it's over to Dan: if "equivalence" is a show-stopper for you, then publication is on hold until we can hash this out as a group. rfc3296bis: http://www.apache.org/~fielding/uri/rev-2002/rfc2396bis.html -- Cheers, Tim Bray (ongoing fragmented essay: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/)Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2003 19:35:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:59 UTC