Re: Arch Doc: 23 June 2003 Editor's Draft (equivalence -> coreference)

Dan Connolly wrote:

> Let's do change "equivalence" to "coreference".

I'm not comfortable with that at all.  In particular, rfc2396bis now 
talks entirely in terms of equivalence, and in section 6.1 I think makes 
the context pretty clear.  So it's over to Dan: if "equivalence" is a 
show-stopper for you, then publication is on hold until we can hash this 
out as a group.


Cheers, Tim Bray
         (ongoing fragmented essay:

Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2003 19:35:25 UTC