- From: Glenn A. Adams <glenn@xfsi.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 15:08:00 -0400
- To: "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org>, <www-tag@w3.org>
I was thinking that both W3C XML Schema and RELAX NG Schema employ different definitions of valid and validity. G. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Lilley [mailto:chris@w3.org] > Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 1:39 PM > To: www-tag@w3.org; Glenn A. Adams > > On Saturday, June 14, 2003, 4:45:00 PM, Glenn wrote: > > > > GAA> In the section "What is the problem?" of [1], I suggest > scoping the > GAA> statements that are made to the XML definition of > validity, and not > GAA> an absolute definition. > > GAA> For example, in the first paragraph after the example, > the phrase > GAA> "is not valid and cannot be validated" is true only with > respect to > GAA> the XML specification's definition of valid and > validatable in the > GAA> use of an XML DTD. The statement is not necessarily true in > GAA> contexts that don't soley depend on the XML definition > of validity. > > What other definitions were you thinking of? > > GAA> Regards, > GAA> Glenn > > GAA> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/xmlIDsemantics-32.html > > > > > -- > Chris mailto:chris@w3.org > > >
Received on Saturday, 14 June 2003 15:08:12 UTC