Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> wrote: > Why not? I suspect that 3023 or its successor will anyhow quite likely. If that's the case and if the TAG agrees with this suggestion, please make every effort to update RFC 3023 first. Please. Regards, -- Masayasu Ishikawa / mimasa@w3.org W3C - World Wide Web ConsortiumReceived on Sunday, 8 June 2003 14:22:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:59 UTC