- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:52:09 +0200
- To: <chris@w3.org>, <tag@w3.org>, <timbl@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
> The solution should also allow a distributed and scalable architecture > that allows multiple users to share one server, rather than the wildly > unrealistic and unfair constraint of the server owner controlling > everything. While I'm all for the most flexible and enabling solution, I think this issue of some users not having control over their servers is a social issue, not a technical issue. Folks that live in apartment buildings don't have total control over their domiciles. If they want total control, they should buy a house. And if enough tenants in a given apartment building (enough users of a given server) want some change to the shared resources, then they can request it, or demand it, or then find a more suitable place to live. Whatever solution is promoted, it should not disregard the rights of server owners to decide how their servers are used, and the fact that folks residing on those servers have agreed to waive certain rights in order to reside there. Cheers, Patrick -- Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 40) 801 9690, patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 04:52:26 UTC