- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 14:05:34 -0700
- To: "'Mark Nottingham'" <mark.nottingham@bea.com>, <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
We've had lots of discussion about the audiences for the web arch document and the findings. It's not clear to us which audience is primary. For example, if it was item #1, we might adopt a much terser writing style consisting mostly of "shoulds/musts/"etc. We seem to be trying to appeal equally to all 3. There is a style of making the findings more descriptive and the web arch document more compact. > I'd reiterate that it might help make the document more digestible by > clearly identifying and targeting its audiences. I can think of three; > * authors of specifications that use URIs > * people and software that use URIs > * people and software that create URIs > > Has there been any discussion on what audience TAG findings should be > written for? It could be that the TAG decides its findings are > primarily for use by the first audience, relying on external articles > and other publications to make the content more palatable to broader > audiences (in which case the current form works well). > Cheers, Dave
Received on Thursday, 14 August 2003 17:07:40 UTC