- From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:47:49 -0700
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@apache.org>, "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com>, "WWW-Tag" <www-tag@w3.org>
> > Seems to me it is in the URI designers choice. If they want widest > > possible global appeal, they use ascii. If they want the widest > > possible local appeal, they use localization. This is the ever present > Exactly. I agree that it should be possible for the technology to Localization and encoding are orthogonal issues. Did you mean to say "English/localize" or did you mean to say "ascii/unicode"? Without clarification, I am afraid that the above has no meaning whatsoever.
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2003 22:47:58 UTC