- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: 23 Apr 2003 11:32:48 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Hello,
The agenda for the TAG's 28 Apr 2003 teleconf is available
as HTML [1] and as text below.
- Ian
==========================================================
Agenda for 28 Apr 2003 TAG teleconference
1. Administrative (30min)
1. Confirm Chair, Scribe?. Regrets: IJ,
2. Accept [7]14 Apr teleconference minutes?
3. Accept this [8]agenda?
4. Next meeting: 5 May?
[7] http://www.w3.org/2003/04/14-tag-summary.html
[8] http://www.w3.org/2003/04/28-tag.html
1.1 Meeting planning
* Please register for AC meeting and WWW2003 if you are a speaker.
* TAG virtual meetings 2 and 19 June (no meeitng 16 June).
Action SW 2003/04/14: Propose meeting times, structure to TAG.
1.2 W3C Track Presentation
* [9]W3C track
* Action PC 2003/04/14: Propose meeting times, structure to TAG.
[9] http://www2003.org/t_www.htm
1.3 TAG report at AC meeting
1. [10]Suggestions for TAG presentation at May AC Meeting from DO and
PC
2. DO, CL to present TAG report.
[10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Apr/0027.html
2. Technical (60min)
2.1 Issues the TAG intends to discuss
* [11]IRIEverywhere-27
+ Completed action TB 2003/04/14: Draft a proposed step forward
on IRI 27. ([12]Done). In that [13]email, TB proposes to
close this issue.
+ Action CL 2003/04/07: Revised position statement on use of
IRIs. CL says to expect this by 21 April.
* [14]contentTypeOverride-24
+ Solicit review of [15]draft finding from IJ?
+ Action SW, NW 2003/04/17: Read Client handling of MIME
headers. If +2, then IJ will send to www-tag.
* [16]whenToUseGet-7
+ Solicit review of [17]revised draft finding from IJ?
+ IJ proposal: Take into account DC's comments and then solicit
review.
* [18]abstractComponentRefs-37
+ See [19]issue description from David Orchard
+ Next steps?
* [20]namespaceDocument-8
+ Action TB 2003/04/07: Prepare RDDL Note. Include in status
section that there is TAG consensus that RDDL is a suitable
format for representations of an XML namespace. Clean up
messy section 4 of RDDL draft and investigate and publish a
canonical mapping to RDF.
+ Action PC 2003/04/07: Prepare finding to answer this issue,
pointing to the RDDL Note. See [21]comments from Paul
regarding TB theses.
* Updates or reports on other issues?
* Review of open action items.
[11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#IRIEverywhere-27
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0090.html
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0090.html
[14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentTypeOverride-24
[15] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mime-respect-20030405.html
[16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#whenToUseGet-7
[17] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/get7-20020610.html
[18] http://www.w3.org/2003/04/24-tag-summary.html#abstractComponentRefs-37
[19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0089.html
[20] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#namespaceDocument-8
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Apr/0046.html
2.2 Architecture document
See also: [22]findings.
1. [23]26 Mar 2003 Working Draft of Arch Doc:
1. Action DC 2003/02/06: Attempt a redrafting of 1st para under
[24]2.2.4 of 6 Feb 2003 draft
2. Action DC 2003/01/27: write two pages on correct and
incorrect application of REST to an actual web page design
3. Action DO 2003/01/27: Please send writings regarding Web
services to tag@w3.org. DO grants DC license to cut and paste
and put into DC writing.
4. Action DC 2003/03/17: : Write some text for interactions
chapter of arch doc related to [25]message passing, a dual of
shared state.
[22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
[23] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-webarch-20030326/
[24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/webarch-20030206#uri-use
[25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Mar/0018.html
2.3 Issues that have associated action items
* [26]URIEquivalence-15
+ SW proposal: Track RFC2396bis where [27]Tim Bray text has
been integrated. Comment within the IETF process. Move this
issue to pending state.
* [28]xmlIDSemantics-32
+ See [29]Chris Lilley draft finding
* [30]xlinkScope-23
+ Status report?
+ See [31]draft, and [32]SW message to CG chairs.
* [33]siteData-36
+ Action TBL 2003/02/24 : Summarize siteData-36
* [34]xmlFunctions-34
+ Action TBL 2003/02/06: State the issue with a reference to
XML Core work. See [35]email from TimBL capturing some of the
issues.
* [36]binaryXML-30
+ Action TB 2003/02/17: Write to www-tag with his thoughts on
adding to survey.
+ Next steps to finding? See [37]summary from Chris.
* [38]contentPresentation-26
+ Action CL 2003/02/06: Create a draft finding in this space.
Deadline 3 March.
* [39]rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
+ Action DC 2003/02/06: Propose TAG response to XML Schema
desideratum ([40]RQ-23).
* [41]uriMediaType-9
+ Action DC 2003/02/06: Start discussion on
discuss@apps.ietf.org, but not urgent
* [42]HTTPSubstrate-16
+ Action RF 2003/02/06: Write a response to IESG asking whether
the Web services example in the SOAP 1.2 primer is intended
to be excluded from RFC 3205
+ See [43]message from Larry Masinter w.r.t. Web services.
* [44]errorHandling-20
+ Action CL 2003/02/06: Write a draft finding on the topic of
(1) early/late detection of errors (2) late/early binding (3)
robustness (4) definition of errors (5) recovery once error
has been signaled. Deadline first week of March.
* [45]metadataInURI-31
+ Action SW 2003/02/06: Draft finding for this one.
* [46]fragmentInXML-28 : Use of fragment identifiers in XML.
1. Connection to content negotiation?
2. Connection to opacity of URIs?
3. No actions associated / no owner.
[26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#URIEquivalence-15
[27] http://www.textuality.com/tag/uri-comp-4
[28] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlIDSemantics-32
[29] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/xmlIDSemantics-32.html
[30] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#xlinkScope-23
[31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0094.html
[32] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0104
[33] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#siteData-36
[34] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlFunctions-34
[35] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0309.html
[36] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#binaryXML-30
[37] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0224.html
[38] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentPresentation-26
[39] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
[40] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xmlschema-11-req-20030121/#N400183
[41] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#uriMediaType-9
[42] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#HTTPSubstrate-16
[43] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0208.html
[44] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#errorHandling-20
[45] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#metadataInURI-31
[46] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#fragmentInXML-28
3. Other actions
* Action IJ 2003/02/06: Modify issues list to show that
actions/pending are orthogonal to decisions. IJ and PLH making
substantial progress on this; hope to have something to show in
May.
_________________________________________________________________
Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL
Last modified: $Date: 2003/04/23 15:28:24 $
--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2003 11:32:50 UTC