- From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 16:29:54 +0100
- To: "'Norman Walsh'" <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Hi Norm, > -----Original Message----- > From: Norman Walsh [mailto:Norman.Walsh@sun.com] > Sent: 11 April 2003 16:28 > To: www-tag@w3.org > Subject: Re: namespaceDocument-8: possible interaction with Namespaces > in XML 1.1 > > / Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> was heard to say: > | Yes and yes, but I believe this might be difficult to achieve. The > | TAG seems to be quite broadly unenthusiastic about URNs but they have > | enthusiastic partisans in the community. > > Yeah. And on the TAG, too, even if in distinct minority :-) Just to stand up and be counted as one who does not have a negative pre-disposition to the use of URNs. Personnally, I would like our arch document to be as general as possible wrt to URI, and only specific wrt to a particular scheme if absolutely necessary. > |> Q2: Your text "URNs are not effectively usable" might lead me to believe > |> that there might be an effort ongoing to standardize how to retrieve > |> resources using URNs. Do you know of such an effort? > | > | Yes, there are such efforts in the IETF; the acronym doesn't spring to > | mind, but that doesn't matter, because I'm sure that several other > | people will spring forward to explain why URNs are in fact retrievable > | and that TimBL and I are blowing smoke when we claim they're not. I > | accept that mechanisms in principle exist to dereference URNs, it's > | just that I've never used a computer where such software was > | installed, so it's clearly far from ubiquitous. > > Others have made those points, so I won't. There's also "OASIS > Extensible Resource Identifier (XRI) TC"[1] but I haven't looked at > it. > > It will come as no surprise to Tim that I second Larry's observation: > > In the long run, I think it's easier to make a URNs retrievable than > it is to make HTTP URLs permanent, and that the W3C should stop > trying to make an anti-URN policy. +1 too.... > > Be seeing you, > norm > > [1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/xri/ Regards Stuart --
Received on Monday, 14 April 2003 11:30:14 UTC