Re: [xmlProfiles-29] xml subsetting in IETF XMPP

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ Fabrice Desré <fabrice.desre@francetelecom.com> was heard to say:
| Chris Lilley wrote:
|> On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, 11:02:16 AM, Henry wrote:
|> HST> Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> writes:
|>
|>>>Also, curiously, *pre*defined entities. Which is very weird.
|> HST> That renders it just plain not XML, in my opinion.
|> I assumed at the time that meant no & lt ; but thinking about it
|> more,
|> perhaps they mean html and mathml style predefined entities for latin
|> 1 characters, math symbols and so on?
|
| It seems to be about &lt; &amp; &pos; etc..
|   I asked on the xmpp list to explain the rationale behind this
| decision. I'll forward the answer.

Yes, please. I'm with Henry, if you don't allow &lt; that's just not XML.
(Do they intend to allow &#60;?)

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM    | There might very well be nothing; nor anyone.
XML Standards Architect | No one to notice that there is nothing, and
Web Tech. and Standards | to consider that natural. But that there is
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | something, and, whatever it may be, the
                        | strange thing! I shall never cease being
                        | amazed at this.--André Gide
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE+ieEbOyltUcwYWjsRAqOXAKCUQrruB7sMqBCQF7P4bKozzppwEACeN+PJ
/Gg8UlbIuZ/SmnFTZNCvt78=
=n+p8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Thursday, 3 April 2003 12:10:48 UTC