- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 16:09:48 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Chris Lilley writes: >SSL> but this recent post of mine to uri@w3.org might be >SSL> relevant: > >SSL> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2002Oct/0027.html > >SSL> URI references and fragment identifiers seem to have grown more >SSL> complex over the years, especially in XML contexts, and it seems >SSL> worthwhile at this point to discuss how they work once again. > >Pointing to a bare id does not seem over complex to me. Your general >point is likely valid but the relevance to this example is not shown. That's fine - I just wasn't sure what exactly the example was saying, and if it's a matter of "pointing to an element vs. pointing to a thing" the drafts discussed at the URL I provided just amplify that we're pointing at elements in this process. I think that means I agree with your perspective, unless I've missed yet another step in the URI dance. ------------- Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA http://simonstl.com may be my URI http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2002 16:09:46 UTC