- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- Date: 23 Oct 2002 16:14:47 +0200
- To: www-tag@w3.org
I'd like to bring the issue of uncessary dependence between W3C specs as illustrated by XPointer. I have already ellaborated on xml-dev and www-xml-linking-comments, but to make it short, XPointer is defining that when I write "foo.xml#bar", there is no need to specify how to associate "foo.xml" with any schema (it's up to the application to do so) to determine wich id will be used but that this schema must be either a DTD or a W3C XML Schema (the list is norminative). To me, this dependence between XPointer and DTD or W3C XML Schema is useless and harmfull. If we leave the application free to choose any document as a schema, the fragment identified by "foo.xml#bar" is de facto depending on an informal agreement between the "client" and the "server" of the fragment (client and server beeing taken in the liberal sense where the "client" might be a XHTML page on a server and the "server" might be the browser in which this page is displaid) and undertermined if such an agreement is missing. If we rely on a non specified agreement, what need is there to require that only a DTD or a W3c XML Schema can be used to express this agreement? A "hard coded" agreement that the id is the concatenation of attributes "id1" and "id2" could work as well, or any other generic or specific way to define what's the id is... Beyong the fact that I disagree on this specific case, I think that a good practice would be to reduce the amount of unecessary dependences between specs! To come back to XPointer and without even mentioning that other organizations might define ways to define IDs, if the W3C needed to define one for a specific case in 2 years time, this would require a new edition of XPointer which can easily be avoided by making the list non normative... Thanks for your attention, Eric See also: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2002OctDec/0021.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2002JulSep/0047.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2002JulSep/0029.html -- Rendez-vous a Paris (Forum XML). http://www.technoforum.fr/integ2002/index.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com (W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2002 10:15:19 UTC