- From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 10:25:12 -0400
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Cc: WWW-Tag <www-tag@w3.org>
At 12:26 PM 10/8/2002 -0700, Tim Bray wrote: >Ann Navarro wrote: > >>>Go to http://www.cisco.com, do a view source and look at the brutal >>>javascript/form hack they use to "select the area" of the website you >>>want to go to. That'd be nice & clean with a good XLink extended-link >>>implementation. This is common (mis-)practice at dozens of big-company >>>web sites. >>See navigation lists <nl> element > >Hm, if you think you *might* be building in XLink support, you might want >to put <nl> on hold for a bit, since it could be done trivially with one >reserved value for xlink:role on the parent (probably still <nl>) >element. On the other hand you might not, I can see someone making an >argument that this is a common enough idiom that it deserves its own >markup. Once again, it would be nice to look at examples of how you might >do it both ways and think about cost/benefit trade-offs. That would be an interesting exercise -- one that we could take up depending on the outcome of some (member) discussions occuring later today at the meta level wrt: linking. Ann ----- Ann Navarro, WebGeek, Inc. http://www.webgeek.com say what? http://www.snorf.net/blog
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2002 10:27:18 UTC