W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > May 2002

Re: Draft registration for application/xenc+xml

From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 09:21:35 -0700
Message-ID: <3CEE688F.6050008@textuality.com>
To: reagle@w3.org
Cc: ietf-xml-mime@imc.org, ian@w3.org, xml-encryption@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
Joseph Reagle wrote:
> But absent TAG 
> resolution, is anyone opposed to text that states "However, the 
> application/xenc+xml type name MUST only be used for data objects in which 
> the root element is from the XENC namespace."

Seems sensible to me.

> Also, Ian, in [3] what does it mean that the registration should be part of 
> the REC? That I should have an appendix in the spec with a copy of my 
> request? (seems odd...)

I think that's the idea.  Why odd? -Tim
Received on Friday, 24 May 2002 12:21:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:51 UTC