- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 17:35:44 -0700
- To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Simon St.Laurent wrote: > 2) I worry about the link to RFC 3023 over time. If RFC 3023 has > successors, will that require a new publication of this document? This > document is in large part a reference to that RFC. What's a good way to address this? > 3) It might be worth taking the opportunity to get rid of the text/ > mess. The discussion of misleading charset information might be a very > good place to do that. I think I agree with what you're proposing, but let's be sure... are you talking about rev-ing 3023 to discourage text/xml? -Tim
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2002 20:35:42 UTC