W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > May 2002

Re: Updated SOAP HTTP GET binding document

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 23:28:19 -0400
To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <20020506232819.F28314@www.markbaker.ca>
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 08:05:39PM -0700, David Orchard wrote:
> Mark,
> You are indeed correct what my response is.  Please note that the section
> you quote is listed in the out-of-scope section.  I disagree that mapping
> all HTTP methods to SOAP methods is required to declare success.  What I
> understood from finding on issue 7 was that GET - particularly
> expressibility in URIs that are GET dereferencable - must be supportable.
> And this proposal attempts to satisfy that finding, not a generic HTTP
> Method to SOAP Method mapping.  FWIW, your mapping goal has never come up in
> the TAG.

Producing a mapping for all methods isn't required.

But somewhere, it MUST be said when the GET binding is appropriate,
versus when a POST binding is appropriate.

I assume you don't believe that it's a good thing to be able to send
any SOAP message with any binding.  But I understand that this is the
current interpretation of the word "binding" as used in SOAP 1.2; that
you can use them interchangeably without consideration for the content
of the SOAP message.  So perhaps calling this work a "suggested adjunct
to the SOAP 1.2 default HTTP binding" (or similar) would help clarify

Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc.
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.      mbaker@planetfred.com
http://www.markbaker.ca   http://www.planetfred.com
Received on Monday, 6 May 2002 23:20:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:51 UTC