- From: Steven Livingstone <s.livingstone@btinternet.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 07:47:28 -0000
- To: "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
I agree namespaces everywhere isn't artistic in any way, but from the discussions, particularly even the simple "about" example, clearly some uniqeuness is needed - i'm open to sugestions :) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org> To: "Steven Livingstone" <s.livingstone@btinternet.com> Cc: <www-tag@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 1:48 AM Subject: Re[2]: cost of new/private URI schemes well known? [was: section 1, intro, for review] > On Tuesday, 19 March, 2002, 23:33:58, Steven wrote: > > > SL> Why not say something is WebTV specific in a standard way that is > SL> still unique? > > SL> I have some ideas on how this could be done - ie. "domain.com/myID:uri" is > SL> not much diferent from "about:blah", but we could at least identify > SL> "microsoft.com:about" from "netscape:about".... > > SL> Only thoughts, but as i'm working on my own "deltabis.com/auth:steven_L" > SL> ideas then maybe skewed. > > > Woohoo, namespaces for URI schemes, and namespaces themselves use URIs, > and fragment identifiers may use namespaces with thus use URIS. All of > that should soon make something that won't fit on the side of a bus, > or a movie trailer.... > > -- > Chris mailto:chris@w3.org >
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2002 02:47:48 UTC