W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2002

Re: Summary of 11 March 2002 TAG teleconf

From: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 11:21:00 -0500
Message-ID: <3C90CDEC.70207@sun.com>
To: www-tag@w3.org
try this XSLT on for size. strips off any Zakim entries including
commands to Zakim and emphasises (bold) any action items.



Tim Berners-Lee wrote:

> We could either turn the log on later and off earlier, and/or  restrict our
> meta comments
> to unlogged IRC lines, or we could just filter the log for good bits
> (ACTION, etc).
> One log http://www.w3.org/2002/03/04-tagmem-irc.html
> I went though and highlighted the significant things such as action changes
> and resolutions.
> Tim
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@apache.org>
> To: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
> Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 3:08 PM
> Subject: Re: Summary of 11 March 2002 TAG teleconf
>>On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 07:53:04PM -0500, Ian B. Jacobs wrote:
>>>[This format is a proposed compromise for meeting summaries:
>>> participation, agenda items, action item summary, IRC log.
>>I like the summary, but not the log.
>>Can we at least remove the garbage from the log?  I don't see why all
>>of the Zakim nonsense needs to be archived, and the procedural stuff
>>(like asking what the phone number is, etc.).  The goal of meeting minutes
>>should be to save something that people can later read and get a handle on
>>the meeting content.  As it stands, our IRC logs are so full of junk
>>that they aren't worth the effort to read.

Received on Thursday, 14 March 2002 11:21:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:50 UTC