W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2002

Re: Summary of 11 March 2002 TAG teleconf

From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 17:08:53 -0500
Message-ID: <09f001c1cadb$aa04e2a0$0301a8c0@w3.org>
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@apache.org>, "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
We could either turn the log on later and off earlier, and/or  restrict our
meta comments
to unlogged IRC lines, or we could just filter the log for good bits
(ACTION, etc).

One log http://www.w3.org/2002/03/04-tagmem-irc.html
I went though and highlighted the significant things such as action changes
and resolutions.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@apache.org>
To: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: Summary of 11 March 2002 TAG teleconf

> On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 07:53:04PM -0500, Ian B. Jacobs wrote:
> > [This format is a proposed compromise for meeting summaries:
> >  participation, agenda items, action item summary, IRC log.
> I like the summary, but not the log.
> Can we at least remove the garbage from the log?  I don't see why all
> of the Zakim nonsense needs to be archived, and the procedural stuff
> (like asking what the phone number is, etc.).  The goal of meeting minutes
> should be to save something that people can later read and get a handle on
> the meeting content.  As it stands, our IRC logs are so full of junk
> that they aren't worth the effort to read.
> ....Roy
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2002 17:03:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:50 UTC