Re: Summary of 11 March 2002 TAG teleconf

try this XSLT on for size. strips off any Zakim entries including
commands to Zakim and emphasises (bold) any action items.

Enjoy,

Chris

Tim Berners-Lee wrote:

> We could either turn the log on later and off earlier, and/or  restrict our
> meta comments
> to unlogged IRC lines, or we could just filter the log for good bits
> (ACTION, etc).
> 
> One log http://www.w3.org/2002/03/04-tagmem-irc.html
> I went though and highlighted the significant things such as action changes
> and resolutions.
> 
> Tim
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@apache.org>
> To: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
> Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 3:08 PM
> Subject: Re: Summary of 11 March 2002 TAG teleconf
> 
> 
> 
>>On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 07:53:04PM -0500, Ian B. Jacobs wrote:
>>
>>>[This format is a proposed compromise for meeting summaries:
>>> participation, agenda items, action item summary, IRC log.
>>>
>>I like the summary, but not the log.
>>
>>Can we at least remove the garbage from the log?  I don't see why all
>>of the Zakim nonsense needs to be archived, and the procedural stuff
>>(like asking what the phone number is, etc.).  The goal of meeting minutes
>>should be to save something that people can later read and get a handle on
>>the meeting content.  As it stands, our IRC logs are so full of junk
>>that they aren't worth the effort to read.
>>
>>....Roy
>>
>>
> 
>