- From: <s.livingstone@btinternet.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 23:01:32 +0000 (GMT)
- To: pcotton@microsoft.com, timbl@w3.org, tvraman@almaden.ibm.com, www-tag@w3.org
- Cc: dsr@w3.org, connolly@w3.org, ph@w3.org
I would say flat text; oh and i remember some exitement when discussing XML mail a couple of years on XML DEV. I think people ought to at least have some pregenated metadata ... would be a good place to start this as well ;) I guess all we need is an aware email editor - or filter. steven > > I have considered bouncing mail to me back if it isn't in a standard > format. > > And what is a standard format? Does Adobe PDF qualify? > > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada > 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 > Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 > <mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com> > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tim Berners-Lee [mailto:timbl@w3.org] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 5:03 PM > > To: tvraman@almaden.ibm.com; www-tag@w3.org > > Cc: dsr@w3.org; dan connolly; Philipp Hoschka > > Subject: Re: Using W3C standard formats on W3C Lists > > > > TV, > > > > I think this is an excellent point. I have considered > > bouncing mail to me back if it isn't in a standard format. > > We could maybe do this automatically for > > lists representing groups. (The www-archive list I would > > exempt as it guarantees nothing in terms of quality). > > > > I will discuss this with the team. That is, I don't think > > it is an issue of web architecture but of W3C policy. > > > > Tim > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <tvraman@almaden.ibm.com> > > To: <www-tag@w3.org> > > Cc: <dsr@w3.org>; "dan connolly" <connolly@w3.org>; "Philipp Hoschka" > > <ph@w3.org> > > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:09 PM > > Subject: Using W3C standard formats on W3C Lists > > > > > > > I am raising this issue on the TAG list because the requirement > > > stated in the Subject line > > > "Use W3C formats on W3C mailing lists" > > > though obvious to those of us who have been involved in W3C work > > > over time is something that is getting increasingly overlooked and > > > side-stepped on the working group lists of many new working groups. > > > > > > I think it's time the W3C instituted a clear policy on what formats > > > are acceptable on working group lists --especially since archived > and > > > searchable mailing lists are a valuable asset and represent the > > > collective memory of the W3C. Locking up portions of this asset in > > > different variant proprietary formats is against the grain of the > > > overall W3C activity --and rather than addressing this issue on a > case > > > by case basis as and when it occurs on wg lists, it would perhaps be > > > more effective to state the use of plain text or HTML for email to > > > working group lists as standard policy at the time working groups > are > > > formed and people join in. > > > > > > > > > --Raman > > > > > > -- > > > Best Regards, > > > --raman > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > T. V. Raman: PhD (Cornell University) > > > IBM Research: Human Language Technologies > > > Architect: Conversational And Multimodal WWW Standards > > > Phone: 1 (408) 927 2608 > > > Fax: 1 (408) 927 3012 > > > Email: tvraman@us.ibm.com > > > WWW: <a href="/bti/redirect.html?http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/raman" target="newLink">http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/raman</a> > > > AIM: TVRaman > > > PGP: <a href="/bti/redirect.html?http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman.asc" target="newLink">http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman.asc</a> > > > Snail: IBM Almaden Research Center, > > > 650 Harry Road > > > San Jose 95120 > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2002 18:01:38 UTC