- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 18 Jun 2002 16:10:05 -0500
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Cc: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org
On Tue, 2002-06-18 at 15:51, Tim Bray wrote: > Dan Connolly wrote: > > >>Source: email from TB. Accepted as > >>augmentedInfoset-22. > > > > > > Yes, we later accepted the issue; so I think > > my action item was overtaken by events. > > Perhaps, but it feels like a no-brainer that a first step ought to be > getting on the Schema WG's radar so we can get some dialogue happening. Yes, I figured doing some sort of heads-up anyway was worthwhile, so I did... * validation design really supported by typing requirements? Dan Connolly (Tue, Jun 18 2002) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002AprJun/0166.html > Query similarly, but we can assume they're in the loop due to Paul's > roles. Er, are any TAG members on schema? -Tim -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2002 17:10:00 UTC