- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 01:11:01 -0400
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
I think's Tim proposal is interesting. Perhaps it should be handed to the XMLP WG (when we've got some time), as we'd probably want to take it to the developer community first to see if they're interested. The XMLP WG has a good relationship with them. Also, I had a sort-of-proposal[1] to the XMLP WG to build a SOAP binding to HTTP GET. It was done tongue-in-cheek, because of the ridiculous nature of what it entailed (using a body on a GET). But it would be the best fit from a structural point of view; basically, use SOAP headers as extended HTTP headers, just as is done on POST, but not have a SOAP body ... though you'd still need to use something like M-GET in order to provide a dispatch hook for the SOAP processing model. Just pointing it out as an FYI. A more realistic solution that I've considered is an RFC 822 serialization of the SOAP Envelope. This would make integration with HTTP (GET in particular) a lot simpler, as SOAP headers could be intermixed with HTTP headers. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Jan/0416.html MB -- Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. mbaker@planetfred.com http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.planetfred.com
Received on Monday, 22 April 2002 01:04:18 UTC