- From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:12:46 +0100
- To: "'Tim Bray'" <tbray@textuality.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Hi Tim, > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@textuality.com] > Sent: 08 April 2002 17:31 > <snip/> > The point I keep trying to make is that the properties like > "nature", "purpsoe", and "description", are properties <emph>of > the related resource</emph>, not of the namespace or of the RDDL > or of the directory entry. T Reset... I had misunderstood something you said in an earlier discussion. What you proposed in [1] (now) seems to me a straightforward and natural way to encode RDDL information in RDF. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Apr/0071.html <snip/> > >This is of course just a variant of whether http://www.rddl.org/ names a > >namespace or a namespace document. > > It names a namespace. That's not in question. If dereferencing > the resource returns a namespace document, that's a good and > useful optional extra. -Tim Ok... i just have to keep reminding myself that a namespace document is just a representation of a namespace and that it has no separate identity of its own. Cheers, Stuart
Received on Tuesday, 9 April 2002 05:13:51 UTC