W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > February 2017

Re: SVG's future

From: Francis Hemsher <fhemsher@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:49:26 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFm2N+ucRrwB+LTYy-dSf_nSfjyUCViVU5FG+3mymew6NQ+YYA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Domenico Strazzullo <strazzullo.domenico@gmail.com>
Cc: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com>, Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Doug Schepers <standards@schepers.cc>, Nikos Andronikos <nikos.andronikos@gmail.com>, グルチヤンラミン <ktecramin99@gmail.com>, "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
I've started a website with the intention of informing web developers of
the features of SVG2 and how they could apply each.
They will be able to comment on each feature and rate it. Currently the
site is sparse, with merely a starting reference using Amelia Bellamy-Royds
I surely could use some help: Anyone who would like to participate can send
descriptions/images/code demonstrating what each feature will provide for a
web developer.
See: http://www.svg2.org/

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Domenico Strazzullo <
strazzullo.domenico@gmail.com> wrote:

> Then you can GIVE respect to whomever you like.
> Now we have a new issue of dogmatic vocabulary. Given, earned, due,
> expected, demand, show, demonstrate, manifestation of, etc.
> As long as you remain free to feel it or not, to show it or not, it’s OK.
> A note on “due”: it’s an inherited concept, by which ordinary subjects of
> the population, in accordance with their inferior rank, owed respect to the
> noble, the gentry, and in general anyone from the leading class, including
> the military with grades. Respect was then GIVEN; not in the concrete
> sense, it was an acquired status, and in the case of nobility it was
> innate. In some cases it could also be earned, as a permanent right,
> through exceptional actions or contributions. It could also be bought by
> financial means through social ascension (same as now and always actually).
> The inferior subject had often the obligation of demonstration, by bowing
> for example, or by other verbal or corporeal manifestations of deference.
> If the subject didn’t, it was not a serious offence, but he or she could be
> compelled to. In case of refusal the person could face serious trouble, and
> even death. At the opposite end a person, particularly one implicated with
> social ascension, could offer repeated manifestations of respect and
> adulation, intended to please the notable receiver, who in turn might show
> his or her magnanimity by granting favors or support.
> But times have changed (and sometimes they go backward). Our ancestors
> everywhere often gave their blood to conquer freedom and the right to
> equality, for us. Now we take it for granted, and by that we help restore
> oligarchy and privileges of upper classes. It’s interesting to see so many
> people now fighting fiercely to reclaim the “due” respect for authorities
> and notable persons, attempting a social ban for those who do not comply.
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Levantovsky, Vladimir <
> Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com> wrote:
>> Someone I know and love once wrote "Respect is GIVEN, not EARNED!"
>> And guess what - she is right!
>> Cheers,
>> Vlad
>> On Monday, February 13, 2017 9:24 AM Sebastian Zartner wrote:
>> On 13 February 2017 at 11:47, Domenico Strazzullo <
>> strazzullo.domenico@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Please let's earn some respect for one another! Different opinions and
>> > valid arguments can be expressed in an objective way, as well as in a
>> > subjective way, let’s leave it to the free will.
>> What I meant is that people in this thread should stop insulting each
>> other. I agree, respect needs to be earned, but insults rather reach the
>> opposite.
>> <snip/>
>> Sebastian
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2017 15:49:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:08 UTC