- From: Francis Hemsher <fhemsher@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 17:14:04 -0500
- To: Domenico Strazzullo <strazzullo.domenico@gmail.com>
- Cc: グルチヤンラミン <ktecramin99@gmail.com>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFm2N+sZhUgJ495FLZyxdu0UAuQJx-W6zz4rFZPY+As3=+CRqA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Domenico, Ramin, etal, I think web developers really like SVG. Many have no idea that 'SVG2 is twice as nice as SVG1" (A banner for a revolt?) Question is...What leverage would 50,000 web developers have to assure SVG2 does not languish is limbo? Any thoughts? Francis On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Domenico Strazzullo < strazzullo.domenico@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Francis, > > > > You have exposed that the SVG2 package is never going to be implemented > in browsers. > > > When you think of all the work that all those volunteers have done over > the years for SVG2, all the expectations, the mass of amazing research and > creations, the mass of lost knowledge. > > > > Also, there is a total lack of coordination between browser vendors and > w3.org on implementing any of its parts. > > > That would be a nice way to put it if at W3 they were candid (vs corrupt). > More likely, since the Chrome crowd want to do their own things, and since > they know better, the thing went out of control for the W3. Or perhaps it > didn’t really go out of control, more like connivance. Edge proposes what > it has in its genes since the Netscape war: controversy and reticence, > which never helped. Firefox then is the outsider. Mozilla’s new position > was to be expected at some point. > > > Has Chris Lilley done a good job? In regard to his plans, yes, he has. Has > Doug Schepers done a good job? In regard to Chris Lilley’s plans, yes, he > has. Doug is a pathetic example of an eager, dedicated man, committed to a > cause, but who carries out somebody else’s plans. Plans that are > diametrically opposed to his own original ones. Go figure that out. As a > common friend once put it “A little soldier who needs an army”. How does it > feel now, Doug? > > > What a waste, what a miserable outcome. So much damage. Crude brutality. > The jealousy and ignorance of those who can’t. > > > In any case, the Chrome crowd will be remembered for being the first (I > think) capable of deteriorating a rendering engine over the years. But of > course, those who know better have the right to underestimate the required > competences. It’s one of their prerogatives. That reminds me of people who > try to reinvent the wheel –which of course is a necessary activity > otherwise we would have cars racing on stone wheels– but when they don’t > have an idea they get one by deprecating the previous wheels, and then see > what happens. > > > OK, Amen to SVG. Ban the polemics. What’s up next? Oh, CSS, let’s see… > Oops! > > > > > Domenico Strazzullo > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 3:14 AM, グルチヤンラミン <ktecramin99@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks Francis >> 15 years? wow, impressive.. well, it might get a bit frustrating, >> is there any way to encourage both parties (w3.org and browser vendors) >> to reach a common understanding ? >> I hope there is a conclusion ASAP. >> >> >> 2017-01-31 22:45 GMT+09:00 Francis Hemsher <fhemsher@gmail.com>: >> >>> Thanks Ramin, >>> You have exposed that the SVG2 package is never going to be implemented >>> in browsers. Also, there is a total lack of coordination between browser >>> vendors and w3.org on implementing any of its parts. >>> This is going in the same direction we experienced when having SVG1 >>> eventually used in browsers, that took over 15 years to be established. >>> Believe me, you are on a frustrating journey... >>> Francis >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:38 PM, グルチヤンラミン <ktecramin99@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear W3C/SVGWG >>>> >>>> I am working for KDDI Technology Co. and I'm writing this email to you >>>> because we have been working on implementation of SVG2 CR vector effects >>>> (described in W3G spec, following link) into Firefox/Gecko since last three >>>> months. >>>> https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/coords.html#VectorEffects >>>> >>>> Sponsored by KDDI, we've succeeded to bring support for those new >>>> effects to firefox/Gecko, however, final shipment has faced to some >>>> difficulties because Mozilla shows no intention to apply new SVG2 spec >>>> unless other browsers i.e. chromium/edge have a plan to do so. >>>> (please refer to following links for more details: >>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.platform >>>> /T_7HTTdt-Es >>>> and >>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1318208 >>>> ) >>>> As a result, to bring new SVG2 spec to reality, it is very important to >>>> encourage all browsers to apply new spec, and to achieve this goal, your >>>> help would be inevitable. >>>> >>>> We are looking forward for your help and support. >>>> >>>> Thank you very much >>>> Ramin >>>> KDDI Technology >>>> >>> >>> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2017 22:14:38 UTC