- From: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 18:51:08 +0200
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Hello, Opera Presto interprets viewport-fill for years - surely other viewers for tiny devices from this time as well. For SVG 1.1 documents it would be a bug to interpret CSS backround properties, but if already available in some viewers, maybe sufficient enough to mention this as properties and presentation attributes in the CR ... Of course for all elements with a viewport. Olaf Amelia Bellamy-Royds: > The most recent discussion I could find about this ended in this post by > Erik Dahlstrom: > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2014Jan/0038.html > > That note references these minutes: > https://www.w3.org/2013/02/07-svg-minutes.html#item06 > https://www.w3.org/2012/07/23-svg-minutes.html#item01 > > It sounds like the decision was to replace viewport-fill with CSS > background, but then no decision was made to make CSS background support > required in non-browser environments, or for nested SVG. All the web > browsers support CSS background on the top-level <svg> element, both for > stand-alone SVG files and for inline SVG in HTML. As far as I know, none > of the major browsers implemented viewport-fill. > > My personal preference would be to make CSS background-color apply to all > SVG viewport elements, rather than using the SVG-specific terminology. >
Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2016 16:52:43 UTC