- From: Tavmjong Bah <tav.w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 09:46:23 +0100
- To: David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>, 'www-svg' <www-svg@w3.org>
On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 17:14 -0500, David Dailey wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: Tavmjong Bah > Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 3:33 PM > > I've written up most of my text issues for the Sydney meeting. Please > have a look at: > > http://tavmjong.free.fr/SVG/TEXT_SYDNEY_2016/ > > --------- > > Hey Tav, > > Looks good. I would agree that " Stand-alone SVG renderers should not > need to deal with this extra level of complexity. " SVG should not be > made any more dependent than it is on having a full-fledged browser > running since that is not the only environment in which it is used, > authored, displayed, etc. Perhaps opinions of users are of > increasingly less interest to the working group, since nowadays we > hear that implementation (as driven by browsers) drives new features > rather than interest, use cases, or principles of good architecture > (whatever those might be). > > However, I don't see among your examples, stuff dealing with aligning > text to alternative or dual baselines, as discussed at say here [1] I think there is definitely interest within the group for this but we have limited resources and needed to make a hard cut on what is going to be in SVG 2 or it would never get out. > Regards > David > > [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2014Sep/0007.html > > > >
Received on Friday, 29 January 2016 08:46:57 UTC