- From: David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 17:14:29 -0500
- To: "'Tavmjong Bah'" <tav.w3c@gmail.com>, "'www-svg'" <www-svg@w3.org>
-----Original Message----- From: Tavmjong Bah Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 3:33 PM I've written up most of my text issues for the Sydney meeting. Please have a look at: http://tavmjong.free.fr/SVG/TEXT_SYDNEY_2016/ --------- Hey Tav, Looks good. I would agree that " Stand-alone SVG renderers should not need to deal with this extra level of complexity. " SVG should not be made any more dependent than it is on having a full-fledged browser running since that is not the only environment in which it is used, authored, displayed, etc. Perhaps opinions of users are of increasingly less interest to the working group, since nowadays we hear that implementation (as driven by browsers) drives new features rather than interest, use cases, or principles of good architecture (whatever those might be). However, I don't see among your examples, stuff dealing with aligning text to alternative or dual baselines, as discussed at say here [1] Regards David [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2014Sep/0007.html
Received on Thursday, 28 January 2016 22:15:10 UTC