- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:32:19 -0800
- To: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
Per an FXTF meeting some time ago <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jun/0678.html>, fantasai and I have been drafting fill/stroke as applied to text in CSS, and with the extensions needed to handle multiline text, hierarchical elements, and multi-layer (background-like) paints. Currently this lives in the Text Decoration 4 ED <https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-4/>. Is this appropriate, or should it live somewhere else less directly text-centric? We're also unsure exactly how much of fill/stroke to define in this spec. Should we take over the entire model, copying text from SVG, or should we only define the syntax, and the rendering parts that are relevant to CSS, letting SVG define the rendering parts important to it? ~TJ
Received on Monday, 25 January 2016 23:33:09 UTC