- From: Rich Morin <rdm@cfcl.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:14:20 -0700
- To: David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>
- Cc: Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, Nikos Andronikos <Nikos.Andronikos@cisra.canon.com.au>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
> On Aug 11, 2016, at 21:33, David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net> wrote: > > I think the Working Group’s willingness to consider interactivity in SVG > inside HTML <img> ... as well as the ability to deform text (and glyphs) > to shapes ... can also be cited as examples of progress ... > In the world of HTML, whence come most of the web standards folk, one often > thinks of words (and their meanings) as being the essence of accessibility. > In the domain of geometry, where the semantics of position and change of > position is "the meaning," the underlying issues ... *are* accessibility. Indeed! > [1] http://cs.sru.edu/~ddailey/svg/GeometricAccessibility.html Unfortunately, several of the image links in this paper are broken. -r -- http://www.cfcl.com/rdm Rich Morin rdm@cfcl.com http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/resume San Bruno, CA, USA +1 650-873-7841 Software system design, development, and documentation
Received on Friday, 12 August 2016 07:14:51 UTC