- From: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 21:05:07 -0400
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>, Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@gmail.com>, www-style@w3.org, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Le 2015-09-30 18:42, fantasai a écrit : > On 09/23/2015 09:18 AM, Koji Ishii wrote: >> >> So this should go to SVG spec rather than CSS spec I guess? > > The computation behavior needs to go into the CSS spec, > but the SVGWG needs to resolve on what they want and to > clarify their spec accordingly. (There's currently a > lot of text in the SVG spec about how the 'rl' and 'lr' > values should behave differently.) > > p.s. Gérard, we should probably turn this SVG into a test. > > ~fantasai The 6 obsolete writing-modes values are: lr, lr-tb, rl, rl-tb, tb, and tb-rl SVG 1.1, section 10.7.2 Setting the inline-progression-direction http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/text.html#SettingInlineProgressionDirection The 'writing-mode' property in SVG specifies exclusively the inline-progression-direction for a 'text' element; so block flow direction should *not* be affected ... lr and lr-tb are equivalent to CSS 'direction: ltr' and 'writing-mode: horizontal-tb'. rl and rl-tb are equivalent to CSS 'direction: rtl' and 'writing-mode: horizontal-tb'. tb, and tb-rl are the equivalent of CSS 'writing-mode: vertical-rl' but for only the inline-progression-direction. - - - - - As far as checking computed values of the 6 obsolete writing-mode values are involved, aren't the 2 following tests from Koji sufficient? Just asking ... http://test.csswg.org/source/css-writing-modes-3/writing-mode-parsing-svg1-001.html http://test.csswg.org/source/css-writing-modes-3/writing-mode-parsing-svg1-002.html computed values of all/each of the 6 obsolete writing-mode values are tested in those 2 tests. - - - - - I looked at your attached SVG... 1- If the 3 <text>s have the same x and y values, then aren't they going to overlap each other? Shouldn't they overlap? 2- What's the expected result of <g style="direction: rtl"> <text x="300" y="100" style="writing-mode: lr; fill: blue;">1 2 3</text> </g> 3- What's the expected result of <g style="direction: rtl"> <text x="500" y="100" style="writing-mode: rl; fill: orange;">1 2 3</text> </g> 4- What's the difference of meaning between "shift the text string" and "reverse the order of all glyphs in the text."? I ask because I sincerly do not know, do not understand the difference of meaning in terms of rendering. These expressions are coming from this sentence: " There are varying interpretations on whether this process causes "writing-mode: rl" to merely shift the text string or reverse the order of all glyphs in the text. " 3.1.1. Obsolete SVG1.1 writing-mode Values https://drafts.csswg.org/css-writing-modes-3/#svg-writing-mode Gérard
Received on Thursday, 1 October 2015 01:05:40 UTC