- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 09:28:18 +1100
- To: Erik Dahlström <erik@xn--dahlstrm-t4a.net>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2015 22:28:55 UTC
On 4 Nov 2015, at 8:13 pm, Erik Dahlström <erik@xn--dahlstrm-t4a.net> wrote: > a <view> element defines a view for its parent <svg> element. The <use> element is allowed to reference <svg> elements. So, should <use> be allowed to reference a <view> element? In http://www.w3.org/2015/08/25-svg-minutes.html#item03 <http://www.w3.org/2015/08/25-svg-minutes.html#item03> we resolved that <view> doesn’t define a view for its closest ancestor <svg>, but the outer <svg>. If we allowed <use> to reference <view>, and if we were consistent with this decision, it wouldn’t be so useful.
Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2015 22:28:55 UTC