- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:21:33 -0400
- To: Regina Henschel <rb.henschel@t-online.de>, www-svg@w3.org
Hi, Regina– ODF 1.2 references SVG 1.1. No matter what happens in SVG 2 (or any future version), all the references there will still be valid, and content tailored for ODF 1.2 will work in any viewer conforming to ODF 1.2 (which, by the way, doesn't include Web browsers). As a side note, unfortunately, ODF 1.2 dramatically misunderstands and misuses both SVG and XML namespaces, such that ODF 1.2 content is not actually compatible with SVG 1.1 (or any other version of SVG). It's more "inspired by" SVG than conforming to SVG; it subsets SVG, and also extends it in incompatible ways, including its handling of SMIL. When last I checked, the SVG support in Open Office wasn't very complete anyway, and didn't support SMIL; perhaps that's changed. I joined the ODF TC for a couple of years to correct it in ODF 1.3 (a.k.a. "ODF-Next"), but their efforts on that spec petered out before anything substantive could be done. So, while I agree with you that we should keep in mind the full set of use-cases for SVG, compatibility with ODF 1.2 is not really possible, because ODF was never compatible with SVG. Regards– –Doug On 3/17/15 4:06 AM, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hello all, > > please keep in mind in all your discussions, that svg is not only used > for web content. Essential parts of drawings are defined in svg in ODF > 1.2. SMIL is used for animation effects of shapes in presentations. For > details see the specification in > http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/os/OpenDocument-v1.2-os-part1.html. > > Kind regards > Regina Henschel > >
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2015 09:21:36 UTC