W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > March 2015

Re: new feature request

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 15:21:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDBL4ST74s5m2bOe4hi=+9Ud7i1R_8XRR0T4s13s4O3zzA@mail.gmail.com>
To: ddailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>
Cc: Philip Rogers <pdr@google.com>, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, Thomas O Smailus <Thomas.O.Smailus@boeing.com>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:51 PM,  <ddailey@zoominternet.net> wrote:
> Just how and why are people dropping SMIL? Where does the formal objection get lodged?
> I cannot think of anything more dramatically incorrect to do.
> Clearly some views of the future of SVG are inconsistent with  others.
> I cannot make an objection to such folly strongly worded enough.

Microsoft has publicly refused to implement SMIL, and has persisted in
this.  Chrome is dropping native SMIL support and replacing it with
browser-JS that reimplements in with Web Animations.

Received on Monday, 16 March 2015 22:22:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:00 UTC