- From: Shane Stephens <shans@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 03:04:05 +0000
- To: Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com>, www-svg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 4 June 2015 03:04:43 UTC
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:18 AM Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com> wrote: > On 2015/06/04 3:20, Philip Rogers wrote: > > For consistency with the other geometry attributes, I don't see many > > costs to promoting 'd' as a simple string presentation attribute. The > > proposal would be to have it work just like animating 'd' works today: > > string -> string where the interpolation is done on the parsed > > representation. > > I'd prefer we don't do this. Apart from the obvious difficulties with > SVG path syntax, the requirements for interpolating between two paths > are so restrictive (same number and type of segments) as to make > hand-authoring path animations almost impossible. > FWIW we could pretty trivially relax this requirement when interpolating in CSS. There's no fundamental reason for forcing matching segments - all segment types can be arbitrarily split and from memory there are adequate representations of each pairwise conversion. Cheers, -Shane
Received on Thursday, 4 June 2015 03:04:43 UTC