- From: Paul LeBeau <paul.lebeau@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 22:36:21 +1200
- To: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 13 July 2015 10:37:07 UTC
Hi all A recent question on SO highlighted the fact that cursive alphabets may not be well-served by the current textPath algorithm. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31362171/how-to-use-svg-textpath-in-persianrtl-text/31365922 Supporting cursive languages may not have been a high priority 15-20 years ago when the original spec was written, but it is probably more desirable now. Should the idea of adding a new alternative algorithm be considered? Perhaps one that specifies glyph deformation rather than simple rotation? Paul
Received on Monday, 13 July 2015 10:37:07 UTC