- From: Juergen Roethig <roethig@dhbw-karlsruhe.de>
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 16:20:18 +0100
- To: <www-svg@w3.org>
Hello world, consistency with other cases is always a good argument for a change. But in this case, I would have proposed to have a consistency to a notation which is _readable_, and _intuitively_ _understandable_ by _humans_ instead of allowing notations like "1.5.3-1,.2-.7e1.2.3" in any case, meaning something like a sequence of six or seven numbers (and even the experts in this thread were not consistent in their opinion whether these are six or seven numbers). SVG should be a language which is able to be read and understood (besides being authored) by humans, not only by machines - otherwise one might define SVG as a binary coded format instead of a textual one in order to save some amount of bytes (if this might be the reason to allow such horrible notations of sequences of numbers). Juergen Roethig
Received on Friday, 6 February 2015 15:21:05 UTC