- From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 18:41:57 -0700
- To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2015 01:42:24 UTC
Ooops! That's what I get for whipping up an answer without actually testing anything... Thanks for checking Rik. I didn't look closely to see how small the deltas were compared to the magnitude in the shape coordinates. I looked at the viewBox, and thought the overall coordinate system dimensions to absolute value was still reasonable enough that the lower-precision digits wouldn't be significant. I didn't factor in the transform on the shape. For Thomas, this clearly wasn't the answer you wanted to hear, but a normalization process is definitely going to be necessary. You'll need to figure out a way to store the information about that conversion process (and the original coordinates) in metadata, and access it when necessary to align multiple drawings. ABR On 2 February 2015 at 18:12, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Actually not :-) > Single precision floats have 6 to 9 digits of precision [1] depending how > you convert, so Thomas' example might be losing details even on conforming > readers. > I saved his example to a fiddle and only IE is able to display it: > http://jsfiddle.net/d31nv0sy/1/ > Chrome, Safari and Firefox all show a blank page. > >
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2015 01:42:24 UTC