- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 10:28:55 -0400
- To: www-svg@w3.org
On 5/27/14, 10:01 AM, Paul LeBeau wrote: > I'm not saying that there aren't potentially large variations between > the cheat and the correct bbox. Just that in most cases where you are > applying a pattern or gradient, the shape probably has an aspect ration > that is not far from 1:1. The original example in this thread was a circle, which definitely has an aspect ratio of 1:1. But the correct bounding box for a rotated-by-45-degrees circle is a factor of sqrt(2) smaller than the cheat bounding box. -Boris
Received on Tuesday, 27 May 2014 14:29:29 UTC