On 25/01/2014 1:18 am, Erik Dahlström wrote: > I'm wondering if there are any compelling reasons for keeping > SVGDocument.rootElement around, given that SVG also requires support for > Document.documentElement. Backwards compat? > > I'd like to propose that we remove SVGDocument.rootElement from SVG2. I'd love to if we can. Do you think we should add a use counter to Blink just to make sure it's safe? (My guess is that nobody will notice.)Received on Saturday, 25 January 2014 22:51:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:54:50 UTC