Re: [svg2] Removing SVGDocument.rootElement from Cameron McCormack on 2014-01-25 (www-svg@w3.org from January 2014)

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 09:50:47 +1100
To: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>, "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <52E43FC7.2080704@mcc.id.au>

On 25/01/2014 1:18 am, Erik Dahlström wrote:
> I'm wondering if there are any compelling reasons for keeping
> SVGDocument.rootElement around, given that SVG also requires support for
> Document.documentElement. Backwards compat?
>
> I'd like to propose that we remove SVGDocument.rootElement from SVG2.

I'd love to if we can.  Do you think we should add a use counter to 
Blink just to make sure it's safe?  (My guess is that nobody will notice.)

Received on Saturday, 25 January 2014 22:51:29 UTC