https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24148 --- Comment #3 from Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> --- (In reply to Ian 'Hixie' Hickson from comment #2) > The WHATWG URL standard is more stable than any W3C or IETF reference on the > subject... (and more importantly, more accurate, too) That is great! And still the specification changes nearly everyday and does not fulfill the requirements of the W3C. Which would not be a problem at all, unless you actually want a W3C spec to get a REC at some point. Would there be daily (but of course then outdated) snapshots that can be referenced, the requirement would be fulfilled and we can finally reference WHATWG specs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.Received on Friday, 24 January 2014 23:35:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:54:50 UTC