- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 18:33:10 -0800
- To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- CC: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, public-fx <public-fx@w3.org>, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
On 1/02/2014 6:18 pm, Dirk Schulze wrote: > I did propose having multiple layers (which is conform to the > intentions of Tav). Multiple colors can be archived with the image() > function which creates a “color image”. I didn't realise your proposal was for multiple layers too. I think it's going to be kind of unobvious that you need to use image(color) for the common case of putting a colour underneath a hatch pattern. For example not being able to write: fill: yellow, url(#diagonalhatch); but instead needing to write: fill: image(yellow), url(#diagonalhatch); but maybe it's unavoidable. On the other hand, how much are we really like a background layer here, and not just something that has similar syntax? It's not like we've got fill-image, fill-position, etc. properties. And there's no fill-color for the <color> in the <final-bg-layer> to be copied into. Maybe it would be OK to allow colours in the middle of the list.
Received on Sunday, 2 February 2014 02:33:45 UTC